Trump reinstates steel and aluminum tariffs: industry reactions and implications

On February 10, 2025, U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order imposing a 25% tariff on all steel imports into the United States, followed by a similar order on February 11, 2025, instituting a 25% tariff on aluminum imports. Effective March 12, 2025, these measures are intended to support domestic production and address national security concerns related to the steel and aluminum industries. In the official Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Section 232 Tariffs, Trump stated that the tariffs aim to ‘protect America's critical steel and aluminum industries, which have been harmed by unfair trade practices and global excess capacity.’

This will effectively remove Section 232 exemptions for key trading partners Canada and Mexico, as well as eliminate tariff rate quotas (TRQs) for major trading partners such as the European Union, the United Kingdom, and Japan.

What were the first reactions, and what could be the consequences for professionals in the metalworking industry?

Europe: fears of escalating trade tensions

European reactions have been particularly strong. Dr. Henrik Adam, President of EUROFER, described the U.S. tariffs as a ‘radical escalation of the trade war,’ warning that they could worsen the already fragile state of the European steel industry. In 2024, the U.S. accounted for 16% of Europe's steel exports, making it a key market for European producers. The new tariffs could disrupt the trade flows, leading to oversupply issues within Europe and increased competition from redirected exports.

Asia: risk of market shifts and price drops

In Asia, concerns are mounting over the potential redirection of global steel exports. Indian steelmakers fear that the U.S. tariffs could cause a surge of cheap steel imports into India, as exporters seek alternative markets. This influx could depress domestic prices and harm local producers. According to Reuters, the Indian government is already considering imposing a temporary tax of 15% to 25% on steel imports to protect its industry.

China, the world’s largest steel producer, may not be directly affected by the U.S. tariffs due to existing trade barriers. However, the China Iron and Steel Association has expressed concerns that such tariffs could disrupt the global steel industry's supply chain, including China's, and may not contribute to fair trade practices. 

Latin America weighs countermeasures against U.S. tariffs

In South America, steel industry groups have voiced significant concerns. The Mexican steel industry association, Canacero, has urged the Mexican government to impose reciprocal measures on U.S. steel imports if Mexico is not granted an exemption. They highlight that 75% of Mexico's steel exports go to the U.S., making these tariffs a potential economic blow.

Similarly, Instituto Aço Brasil stressed the need to restore the 2018 export quota agreement, which previously allowed Brazil to export fixed quantities of steel to the U.S. without tariffs. Finance Minister Fernando Haddad reaffirmed that the Brazilian government would focus on negotiations rather than retaliation. As the second-largest exporter of steel to the United States, Brazil aims to maintain stable trade relations while protecting its industry’s interests.

In Argentina, the Cámara Argentina del Acero called on the national government to reach an understanding with the U.S., emphasizing Argentina’s position as a reliable supplier and the need for coordinated action against unfair competition, particularly from China.

What this means for metalworking professionals

Restoring tariffs on steel and aluminum is expected to have wide-reaching effects on metalworking professionals and industries reliant on these materials. 

U.S. steelmakers, represented by the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), expressed support for the administration's commitment 'to implement a robust and reinvigorated trade agenda'. However, steel-consuming industries, including automotive and construction, warn of rising costs and supply chain disruptions, with the National Foreign Trade Council arguing that tariffs will undermine competitiveness 'and increase the costs paid by American manufacturers that rely on steel and aluminum as inputs'. Some market analysts predict that U.S. steel prices could rise significantly due to reduced competition from foreign suppliers.

Trade restrictions may also trigger retaliatory measures, with key U.S. trade partners like the EU, Canada, and Mexico considering counter-tariffs on American exports, further complicating global supply chains.

Picture by Visual Capitalist

What’s next?

Trade negotiations between the U.S., EU, and key allies will be critical in determining long-term effects.

The European Commission has already hinted at possible countermeasures, including retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods if a resolution is not reached. Meanwhile, Canada and Mexico are expected to push for exemptions, given their deep integration with the U.S. supply chain.

As global steel and aluminum markets adjust, businesses will need to evaluate alternative sourcing strategies and assess the potential impact on production costs and competitiveness.

For a broader perspective on the political dynamics shaping the U.S. steel industry, please refer to this article published before the presidential elections.

You may be interested in reading: 
The steel planisphere: the major steel-producing countries
Mirror of the Markets: news from the bars and profiles industry